|
Growth of alternative football
fan networks not only countered the hegemony of the rapacious
chairmen or the Government, they were also fighting against the
hooligan networks that were damaging the self-image of the game.
While some fans wanted to articulate their frustrations by stabbing
one another, wrecking football grounds and attacking the police,
some wanted to prove that they could voice their grievances in
an intelligent fashion and construct a balanced argument.
The Mag attempted to maintain the notions of magazine professionalism
in respect to polished production, unbiased content, high standards
of writing and desire for objectivity, while never losing sight
of its aim of providing access for the minority of NUFC supporters.
In the second issue of The Mag, there is an interview with Malcolm
Dix, a member of the Magpie Group, in which he was frank and open
about the boardroom situation and their hopes to float the club
on the stock exchange. Adjacent to the interview was a statement
by Mark about their desire to provide an equal opportunity for
both sides in the power struggle to state their case, but the
only response to communications to the club were letters effectively
warning them off.
Mark's balanced approach on one feature was contradicted by another
only a few pages earlier about a comment made by McKeag describing
the club as 'family silver'. This enraged the editor enough to
respond in his editorial by pointing out that the board have never
put anything into the club whereas the fans turn up every week
like sheep, keeping a group of selfish, small-minded men in power,
which is a belief that unites supporters across the country:
Fans of all teams have a pet hate and that is the ego-maniac
in the boardroom. They hate the thought that a game which provokes
the loyalty of a community should be run to suit the whims of
a rich businessman. (Phil Shaw, Whose Game Is It Anyway? The Book
of the Football Fanzines, 1989)
At the end of his editorial, Mark claims that the only way they
can truly affect change is through a boycott of matches. His exhibition
of radical activism to appropriate change is reminiscent of the
early punk and anarchist zines that he used to read during his
youth, "A bit of rebellion, that's what you need. You need
something that's not necessarily agitating the establishment,
but is there as a counterbalance."
Pro-anarchist messages and an oppositional stance to institutions
is common to alternatives media, so Mark's suggestion of a boycott
in his editorial had politicised the situation to their advantage
by voting with their feet the club would be forced, financially,
to listen.
Atton believes that the content of most football zines is radical
to some degree and as critical of corporatism as any anarchist
magazine, though it is his use of Downing's theory of radical
media that I feel is most applicable to The Mag.
Downing's 'alternatives in principle' are based on an anarchist
philosophy but eschew the presumption of a publication's penchant
for anarchism. These principles maintain that no matter the domination
of capitalist mass media, they too are as hierarchical, limiting
and bound by authority as the culture they are countering.
He prioritises process over product, organisation and engagement
over words and circulation listing his principles as follows:
1. the importance of encouraging contributions from as many interested
parties as possible, in order to emphasise the 'multiple realities'
of social life;
2. that radical media, while they may be partisan, should never
become a tool of a party or intelligentsia;
3. that radical media at their most creative and socially significant
privilege movements over institutions;
4. that within the organisation of radical media there appears
an emphasis on prefigurative politics.
Building on a Gramscian counter-hegemonic resistance and carefully
considering his terminology, Downing preferred to label any publication
that met his four principles 'radical alternative media', because
he considered 'alternative media' to be oxymoronic; since everything
is, at some point alternative to something else. Over the course
of its 150 issues The Mag has demonstrated that its content is
non-political, but firmly grounded in the 'alternatives in principle'
- distinctly alternative to both the Official Club magazine and
the matchday programme.
|