|
Foucault's Pendulum (Il pendolo
di Foucault, 1988)
By Umberto Eco
Nothing would have ever made me read this book if Thanos had
not presented it to me with a knowing smile and a slight nod of
his head. The title alone was startling and the quotes on the
back cover troubled me even more, 'a Shakespearean alternation
of paroxysm and intimacy' and 'intricate'. My approach to the
book was one of trepidation, but I persevered and part of me was
glad.
I understood less than ten percent of the plot content, but thoroughly
enjoyed 100% of the book. You find that every page is packed full
of genuine historical events, people and places, which brings
a sinister truth to the novel's conspiracy theories. I have learnt
that the author is a professor of semiotics, which is the study
of communication through signs and symbols; this skill allows
him to turn books such as the Bible on its head and create controversial
meanings from innocent Psalms.
The book utilises the idea of analogies to great effect and the
characters use this to formulate their own Plan, in which they
weave together all the conspiracy theories concerning a religious
order called the Templars. The narrator of the story, Casaubon
details the rules they follow and if you replace the objects with
religious and historical theories, then you can understand how
Eco put together the intricate Plan:
"There is no way to decide whether an analogy is good or
bad, because to some degree everything is connected to everything
else. For example, potato crosses with apple, because both are
vegetable and round in shape. From apple to snake, by Biblical
association. From snake to doughnut, by formal likeness. From
doughnut to life preserver, and from life preserver to bathing
suit, then bathing to sea, sea to ship, ship to shit, shit to
toilet paper, toilet to cologne, cologne to alcohol, alcohol to
drugs, drugs to syringe, syringe to hole, hole to ground, ground
to potato."
Casaubon, along with his two work colleagues Belbo and Diotallevi,
play an intellectual game with the analogies. Together they piece
together a plan that connects the Knight Templars, the crusades,
the Ark of the Covenant, the Holy Grail, plate tectonics, William
Shakespeare, the Second World War, Francis Bacon and Foucault's
pendulum. Novelist, Anthony Burgess once commented that the novel
is an encyclopaedic work that needed an index.
A friend compared Foucault's Pendulum to Dan Brown's The Da Vinci
Code and said that Umberto Eco has written literature, while Dan
Brown has produced a blueprint for a movie script. For all of
you who are 'blown away' by the secrets of Dan Brown's imagination,
you have seen nothing until you complete this Eco literary masterpiece.
|